What’s Coming to Sitecore OrderCloud

In my previous blog post, I discussed Sitecore OrderCloud’s philosophy of “Flexibility Over Features” and the product’s strategies around this philosophy. After that Sitecore Symposium happened and we had opportunities to hear Sitecore OrderCloud’s roadmaps and directions from the Sitecore leadership team. Based on that I need to amend my previous blog post. I also gathered some information about the Product Collections functionalities roadmap with the Sitecore OrderCloud team. I will discuss that in this article because some issues I raised in my previous article will be addressed by items included in that roadmap.

Project Affinity

Sitecore is not abandoning the “Flexibility Over Features” philosophy. Sitecore OrderCloud will continue to be part of MACH Alliance and enhance the product based on its core philosophy. The new direction is that there are features and integrations that make sense to add as part of the solutions (not necessarily as part of the core product) because those can be used by customers. And, those can be done without compromising the core philosophy. For example, most eCommerce solutions need to calculate tax and creating tax plug-ins to Avalara, Vertex, etc. makes sense as long as Plug-ins can be customizable and configurable. Full details are not available yet, but I envision that we will be able to choose the tax service in the OrderCloud portal and configure that. In the Calculate an Order integration event a call will be made to the tax plug-in to calculate the tax. The plug-ins will have integration options like webhooks so that we can customize them. In addition to providing out-of-the-box integrations, Sitecore has also decided to provide Storefront templates based on XM Cloud and a Commerce Management Portal for business users. This will significantly make it easy for the partners to recommend OrderCloud as an eCommerce platform to their clients. All these are part of Project Affinity which Sitecore announced in the Symposium. The timeline as announced is the end of 2023.

Sitecore Search

Sitecore Discover although treated as a separate service it is becoming a first-class citizen for OrderCloud-based solutions. It will cover both product search and content search for the Storefront. Discover’s AI-based search will provide experience-based search results for eCommerce solutions. OrderCloud does have an in-built search for products, customers, and orders. I think this search will be used by the Commerce Management Backoffice.

Sitecore Connect

Sitecore announced Sitecore Connect, an integration platform that can be used by partners and customers to build Low-Code/No-Code integrations. Sitecore Connect comes with 1000s of pre-built connectors. These connectors can be integrated with Sitecore OrderCloud in an almost drag-and-drop fashion. It makes sense for Sitecore to build some connectors like payment gateways, tax connectors, etc. in the OrderCloud platform itself because of the sensitive nature of the data. For example, payment gateways require the platform to be compliant with PCI compliance. Also, integration between Sitecore products will also be expected for Sitecore to build. One such example is the integration between Sitecore OrderCloud and Content Hub. But, Sitecore Connect opens up immense possibilities for connecting OrderCloud with diverse platforms. In the B2B business, in most cases, sellers use some kind of ERP for order fulfillment. There are many ERP connectors that will be available in Sitecore Connect. Some examples are Infor, Acumatica, Oracle, SAP, etc. I would imagine that when Sitecore Connect will be released, OrderCloud can be integrated with these ERPs.

New Product Collections Enhancements

In my previous blog, I discussed the limitations of the current Product Collections data model and APIs. Particularly I pointed out that Product Collections can be created only for users and we can’t add eXtended Properties at the item level. I took these to the OrderCloud product team so that I can add the feature requests. What I learned they are ahead of me. They shared the below enhancements from their roadmaps. Bolded enhancements are what I wanted to request.

  • ProductCollection entry xp
  • ProductCollection readable by Marketplace Owner (MPO)
  • “Public” ProductCollection  (viewable by any buyer user in your marketplaces)
  • Sharable ProductCollection (viewable by designated buyer users in your marketplace)
  • Properties to enable registry-like functionality (QuantityRequested/QuantityPurchased)

The disclaimer from the OrderCloud team is that currently the above enhancements are being considered, but the plan may change and some of them may not be part of the product.

Final Thoughts

I am excited about the future of OrderCloud and the path Sitecore is taking. Especially, including Sitecore Connect in the architecture shows Sitecore’s commitment to Composable Architecture. According to Gartner one of the pillars of composable DXP is Integration. Sitecore Connect will fill up that gap and help OrderCloud to reach diverse platforms.

Posted in Commercce, OrderCloud, Sitecore | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Flexibility Over Features Philosophy in Sitecore OrderCloud Architecture

Sitecore OrderCloud is a different kind of eCommerce platform. We know that it is a cloud-native, API-first, headless, SaaS platform, but Sitecore claims that they followed a philosophy when they built the platform or when they are thinking about building new features in the platform. Sitecore calls it “Flexibility Over Features“. You can read about this in this article. One of the main reasons for following this philosophy as explained in the article is that B2B Commerce is too complicated and it is not possible to create features that cover all business cases. Instead, Sitecore decided to create an eCommerce engine that’s flexible enough so that all kinds of business scenarios can be built on that. The claim is that building features will make the architecture rigid. Is this true? In this article, I will examine if it is true and if Sitecore is following up with what they are saying.

This is not an article to establish that Sitecore OrderCloud is a superior or inferior eCommerce platform because it follows this particular philosophy. In fact, there is no platform out there that satisfy all B2B Commerce sellers’ need. The decision to choose an eCommerce platform depends on many factors, including architecture, but often architecture is not the only factor.

Most eCommerce platforms in the market come with an administration portal. Sitecore OrderCloud doesn’t have one. There is Seller Admin Headstart, a starter kit open-source solution built on AngularJS, but it is not a full-featured Admin Portal. Not even close. This comes up often when prospective clients look at the OrderCloud platform. OrderCloud provides a portal where the organization’s marketplaces (businesses) can be managed, but it is not built for business users. Portal provides API Console and some enhanced UIs for creating webhooks, API Clients, etc. and it can be understood by developers. Since Sitecore OrderCloud is providing a commerce engine on which clients can implement their features based on business requirements the Admin Portal features will be different for different clients. This is the line of reasoning behind not having a single Admin Portal for the platform.

I will explain how the Sitecore OrderCloud team approaches Flexibility Over Features using a recent enhancement they have added to the platform. They have added Product Collections feature. A Product Collection is a data model which represents a collection of products that you can create via ProductCollection APIs. You can learn more about Product Collections if you read this article. A Product Collection can be used for different purposes, but let me start with some requirements I have seen before in the B2B Commerce implementation that I was part of.

Most eCommerce sellers want Wish List feature and all most all eCommerce platform comes with Wish List feature. But, since the B2B buying process is bulk buying and repeated buying often, clients need more than just Wish List. Some Clients asked us to implement Frequently Purchased Items List from previous orders. Most B2B users want to work with multiple orders. In the process of creating orders they want to save the order so that they can modify or purchase the order later. This is called Saved Order feature. Saved Order is a very common feature in eCommerce platforms. Ecommerce platforms commonly implement the above-mentioned features as separate features with their own workflows and data models that fit the purpose. You can customize Wish List or Saved Order, but you can’t use them for creating something else like Frequently Purchased Items. The benefit of this approach is that you get Wish List and Saved Orders features out of the box with the eCommerce platform. If that works well for your business it’s great. On one occasion, a client’s requirement was to implement Favorites. Favorites is more of a B2C feature where logged-in users can favorite products so that they can find their favorite products from the list. It is close to Wish List except that when the user is visiting a favorited product, we need to show the favorite icon.

Sitecore OrderCloud doesn’t provide features like Wish List or Saved Orders. The approach in OrderCloud is based on Flexibility Over Features. They see all these features as collection of products. It is kind of a minimalistic approach where OrderCloud says, we will support to give you the ability to create and manage Product Collections, implement features using Product Collections that suits your purpose. So, we can use Product Collections to implement Wish List, Saved Orders, Frequently Purchased Items, Favorites, etc. How to do that? Below I tried to explain with some examples.

We will not go into great detail to implement Wish List or Saved Orders, but talk about simple implementation. All these features are collection of products with additional functionalities. Using Product Collections APIs, I can create Product Collections and identify the type of collection with an XP property “CollectionType”. The XP is helping me to customize Product Collections for my implementation. Here is API request for this.

curl --location --request POST 'https://sandboxapi.ordercloud.io/v1/me/productcollections' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <buyer token value>' \
--data-raw '{
    "Name": "Wish List 1",
    "xp": {
        "CollectionType": "Wish List"

The above code will create Wish List product collection. I can use a similar code to create another Wish List or a different product collection like, “Frequently Purchased Items“. After this, we need to add products to the collection. The below code shows how that can be done.

curl --location --request PUT 'https://sandboxapi.ordercloud.io/v1/me/productcollections/<product collection id>/<product id>' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <buyer token value>' \
--data-raw '{
    "xp": {
        "Quantity": 2

The above code adds a product to the product collection, but it doesn’t add the XP. We will talk about the XP part soon when we discuss the current limitation of the Product Collections data model. Using the Product Collections data model and APIs we can implement different kinds of List features as needed. Since OrderCloud doesn’t dictate how Lists should work, it’s completely up to the implementor to decide how to build the features. This is a very powerful way to build solutions, but a lot of restraints require on the platform architecture to stick to this idea and OrderCloud is doing that by considering platform enhancement based Flexibility Over Features philosophy.

I have created a Postman collection for this purpose. You can fork from my collection and work on Product Collections API by visiting the below Postman link.

Run in Postman

Let’s talk about the limitations of the current Product Collections data model and APIs. First, Product Collections works at the ‘Me’ level, which is the current storefront user. This works for the lists on B2C Commerce, but on B2B Commerce, lists are often needed at the Buyer level so that all Buyer users can share lists. The Product Collections documentation mentioned this limitation and talk about expanding the feature to the Buyer level in the future. The other limitation I found is that, when adding products to the collection, I can’t add XP at the item level. I can add only the product id. API doesn’t support this.

This is a limitation because implementation using the Product Collections feature will need to save custom data at the collection item level using XP. For example, if I use Product Collections for implementing Saved Orders, I need to save orderline level data like quantity, line notes, etc. We can get around the limitation by storing data outside of OrderCloud, but that will be a lot more complicated to implement than using XP to store that data.

As an architect, I like the idea of Flexibility Over Features because it gives me lots of freedom to create architectures for implementations and reduce friction. My preference for recommending an eCommerce platform for our clients doesn’t depend on just one notion of the architecture. In spite of that, I like the way Sitecore OrderCloud approaches building the platform around this concept. It fits well in Cloud based SaaS architecture.

Posted in Commercce, OrderCloud, Sitecore, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Sitecore’s Year of XM Cloud

The Sitecore Symposium is in a month, happening in Chicago from 17th Oct. to 20th Oct. Every year we anticipate the big announcements about the platform. We MVPs who closely follow the discussion in different Sitecore forums and Sitecore User Groups, get a sense of what is coming. Last year it was all about Composability. Sitecore acquired a bunch of companies and moved the platform from monolithic architecture to composable architecture. But, composability doesn’t work well if the core platform is not in Cloud and SaaS. To fill up that gap Sitecore quickly moved the core CMS platform to Cloud. It is called XM Cloud which is a Cloud-native Headless CMS platform without losing the Content Authoring experience. This is a year of XM Cloud.

Last year’s focus on the composability of the architecture provided us with opportunities to explore the cloud-native SaaS platform that Sitecore acquired. I wrote several technical articles on OrderCloud, Content Hub, Experience Edge, and JAMStack, and how to approach Frontend First Architecture for CMS applications. This year we haven’t seen much movement on these composable platforms other than building demos by Sitecore using these platforms to showcase how to utilize these platforms to build applications and focusing on moving core Sitecore CMS to the cloud. As MVP, we learned about XM Cloud early on but it is now released in a limited capacity for customers to try. MVPs and Partners have to wait to try their hands at it. So, can’t do much architectural exploration at this time other than what Sitecore is documenting and showing us. A good place to start for everyone is this article.

The architecture and technology considerations for moving XM to the cloud are quite interesting. Sitecore is trying to upgrade the architecture of core CMS to match the current web technology trend but also trying to keep the features and functionalities they built over the years. This tension of not throwing out the good things that Sitecore spent so much time to build but also being competitive with much younger CMS platforms, created an interesting architecture for XM Cloud. For example, the feature like Experience Editor is tightly coupled with the platform and many more features are like that. So to move XM to the cloud requires to deploy everything using containers.

Server-Side Development Experience

Since the XM Cloud is quite different from the SaaS Cloud application, the development experience differs significantly. Thankfully, it is actually a good thing for Sitecore developers because, if you are doing server-side development, it is no different than what you do now except for the deployment process. For example, if you are extending a pipeline, you will do the same way and push your code to GitHub after testing on your local machine. You will go to your Organization’s project environment at https://portal.sitecorecloud.io/ or use the Sitecore Command Line Interface to deploy code. This is usually not the way SaaS application works. In SaaS applications, custom extension codes are kept separate from the core platform code. For example, the extension code for the OrderCloud application is separated into the middleware and the middleware code integrates with the OrderCloud via Webhooks and Integration Events. This architecture has a great benefit when it comes to upgrading the platform because the custom code is separated from the platform code. It will be interesting to see how the XM Cloud upgrades will be done.

Frontend Development Experience

XM Cloud makes the data available in the Experience Edge (a CDN) via GraphQL APIs. So, there is no CD server or web database. Since contents are available to the Edge as headless GraphQL APIs, you are free to use any Frontend Javascript Framework to build the web application. But, the problem with building web applications without considering the XM Cloud server-side development is that you lose the business user-friendly content management through Experience Editor. This additional consideration force you to use JSS and you can’t be just a frontend developer to develop a web application on Sitecore. This would not be the case if Experience Editor experience can be provided on the frontend side. That’s something companies like Uniform and Builder.io are doing. They have created a framework to connect to headless CMS and provide an Experience Editor-like content management experience. The sitecore roadmap shows that they are building SiteBuilder which will be the frontend version of Experience Editor. Since contents are available heedlessly on the Edge building JAMStack application and hosting them on any hosting provider like Vercel, Netlify, etc. has become very easy.

What about SXA?

SXA concerns with server-side component development. Now since things are moving to the Frontend, headless SXA is introduced. In Headless SXA way developers start from SXA to build the web application and then use JSS to complete the Frontend. Again Sitecore is trying to adjust its current technology.

Where are we heading?

Sitecore hasn’t not started as a headless Content Management System. The technology on which Sitecore was built was server-side technology. The advancement of JavaScript frameworks pushed the technology more towards frontend and headless. But, headless has it’s problem too. It’s true that headless system are overly developer centric. I think, Sitecore is going to move more and more content management features to the frontend. The current situation with shift in the architecture is normal in any product’s life cycle in the realm of technology advancement. Like any other product, Sitecore has to catch up with new technologies and at the same time keep selling the product. To be honest architecture doesn’t run the business, business influences architecture.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sitecore Experience Edge API Architecture and a Postman Collection

Sitecore Experience Edge is the new delivery platform for Sitecore Content Hub and Sitecore XM. As it happens documentation is not all very clear. While setting up the Experience Edge I encountered some issues. In this blog post, I discussed those issues and I discussed some concepts that I think will help others to understand Experience Edge architecture.

I have created a Postman API collection for Experience Edge APIs and shared it in this post. Click on the button below and fork from my publicly shared collection to use the APIs in your Postman. If I modify the collection in the future, you will be able to sync with your version.

Run in Postman

Experience Edge APIs

Understanding Experience APIs can be confusing initially. Let’s talk about the purposes of different domains first.

Content Hub Sandbox Domain

This is the domain name for your Content Hub Sandbox. The URL looks like <sanbox name>.stylelabsdemo.com. This is also the domain used for GraphQL Preview API to return GraphQL results of unpublished data. The URL for GraphQL Playground (IDE) is 
https://<sandbox name>.stylelabsdemo.com/api/graphql/preview/ide/ and GraphQL API endpoint is https://<sandbox name>.stylelabsdemo.com/api/graphql/preview/v1

Auth0 or Authentication Server Domain

This service is responsible for providing security for the Experience Edge Administration. We retrieve the JWT authentication token from this domain to use the admin APIs securely. The URL looks like https://one-sc-beta.eu.auth0.com

Audience Domain

The audience URL contains the Tenant Id for your Experience Edge system and identifies the tenant for which the authentication token is going to be issued. This token can be used only for administering the tenant mentioned in the URL. The URL looks like https://delivery.sitecore-beta.cloud/tenant_id. Tenant Id is usually the name of your Content Hub Sandbox. You can also find the Tenant Id in the Content Hub license using the API Content Hub API route /api/status/license.

Experience Edge Domain

Experience Edge is the delivery service that runs on Cloudflare. When we publish content from Content Hub those contents get pushed to Experience Edge and get cached. Experience Edge domain is used to manage the delivery service, manage delivery API Keys, and query data using GraphQL queries. The Admin API endpoint base URL is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/admin/v1,
the API Key endpoint base URL is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/apikey/v1,
GraphQL Playground URL is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/graphql/IDE,
and GraphQL API endpoint URL is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/graphql/v1.

The above mentioned domain names are what provided by Sitecore currently for the Sandbox. It may not be same in future. The production server domain names will be different. Whatever the domain names are these are the four domains and the corresponding URL we should be aware of.

There are Four types of APIs.

Admin API

Admin APIs are used to administer the Experience Edge delivery system. For example, if you want to change the Content Cache Time To Leave (contentCacheTtl) setting, you will use Admin API. The base URL for this is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/admin/v1.

Token API

Token APIs are used to manage API Keys generated for accessing the Experience Edge delivery system. For example, if you want to see what API Keys are there currently available in the system, you need to use the Token API. The base URL for this is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/apikey/v1.

Delivery API

Delivery API is the GraphQL endpoint to query content from the Experience Edge delivery system. You can use the Delivery API to access only the published data from the Content Hub. The URL for GraphQL Playground is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/graphql/IDE, and the URL for GraphQL endpoint is https://edge-beta.sitecorecloud.io/api/graphql/v1.

Preview API

Preview API is used to query unpublished data from Content Hub. The API Key and the URL for Preview API is different from Delivery API. The URL for GraphQL Playground is
https://<sandbox name>.stylelabsdemo.com/api/graphql/preview/ide/ and the URL for GraphQL endpoint is https://<sandbox name>.stylelabsdemo.com/api/graphql/preview/v1.

The following diagram shows different APIs and their URLs.

Location of client_id and client_secret for JWT

To get the JWT token to be used to authenticate Admin API, you need a client_id and client_secret. The documentation about where to find this information is not very clear. This is available in Content Hub OAuth Client. The OAuth Client name is ‘delivery’. Open that client and use the client_id and client_secret from that OAuth Client in Admin Token API.


In this blog, I discussed how APIs for Sitecore Experience Edge for Content Hub has been structured. I hope this helps you to understand the architecture quickly and helps you get on with your work. I have provided a Postman collection that will help you to quickly start with the APIs in your Experience Edge system.


Posted in Content Hub, jamstack, Sitecore, Sitecore Experience Edge, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Build a Static Website with Sitecore Experience Edge for Content Hub and Next.js

I am back with another installment of building static website with Content Management Service and I am back with another installment of building a static website with Content Management Service and Next.js. This time I am adding Sitecore Experience Edge for Content Hub in the Frontend First Architecture. Sitecore Experience Edge is a Content Delivery Service on the top of Content Hub or Sitecore XM. Experience Edge delivers content through GraphQL endpoints which I have used to generate the static web pages for my photo blog website. For my purpose, it is just another source of my website content. But, Experience Edge is more than just a content source. I have highlighted some important features at the end of this article.

Deployment Architecture

Based on my Frontend First Architecture, I needed to add Experience Edge in the deployment architecture. When I switch my content service to use Experience Edge, it uses GraphQL delivery APIs to get content from Experience Edge CDN and push my static pages to Vercel Edge. The following diagram shows the deployment architecture with Experience Edge included as one of the content delivery platforms.

Deployment Architecture including Experience Edge

Application Architecture

Our application architecture has not changed except that we have a new API Helper for working with Experience Edge. There is no need to discuss about the application architecture again. You can find that in my previous blog article. Below is the application architecture diagram including the new XEdgeApiHelper highlighted.

Application Architecture including Experience Edge Api Helper

It took me very little time to implement the new Api Helper code. In ContentFulApiHelper I have used GraphQL queries to populate data. I used the same approach for XEdgeApiHelper except that the GraphQL schemas are different. So the queries are different and handling data returned by the queries was a little different. I have shared the code in Github so that you can take a look.

Experience Edge Features

I am not going to discuss all Experience Edge features. You can learn about Experience Edge from the

I am not going to discuss all Experience Edge features. You can learn about Experience Edge from the documentation. I am going to talk about how to approach to work with Experience Edge. There is no free tier for Experience Edge or Content Hub. If you are an MVP you can send an email to
mvp-program@sitecore.net to get $50 credit. If the company you work for already has a sandbox that’s a better option for learning. You may read this document to understand how to set up the Content Hub sandbox including Experience Edge.

Currently, there is no UI to interact with Experience Edge. You have to manage it using APIs. I am hoping Sitecore will come up with a CLI at some point. There are two types of APIs, Management APIs (Token and Admin APIs) and Content APIs (Delivery and Preview APIs). The Management APIs are Rest APIs and Content APIs are GraphQL APIs. The following diagram shows how APIs are used.

Source: Sitecore

You will need a client_id and a client_secret from Sitecore to generate the token for authenticating Admin and Token APIs. For using Delivery and Preview APIs, you have to create API Keys in Content Hub.

The way Sitecore is positioning Experience Edge as a Content Delivery platform, I think Experience Edge will be always needed for Content Hub implementation, although the license for Experience Edge is separate from the Content Hub license. You may use just the Content Hub for your implementation but it will not perform as well as if you have Experience Edge. In my first post in this series, I discussed how we can implement with just Content Hub using Javascript Client SDK. Then the question arises, what is the use of Content Hub APIs. I think the Content Hub APIs will be used mainly for automated content creation and management. But when it comes to rendering content, the advantage of using Experience Edge cannot be ignored. The biggest advantage of using Experience Edge is omnichannel content delivery which can be based on devices, location, and many other segments. Rendering content via GraphQL gives the content consumers the ability to decide what content they want. Along with GraphQL, content caching and delivering content from the closest location will provide optimum performance.

That’s all for this article. Please checkout the code in Github. See you in the next article.


Posted in Content Hub, jamstack, Next.js, Sitecore | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Frontend First Architecture for Decoupled Headless CMS Integration

In my last two blog posts, I discussed creating a static website using Nextjs and Sitecore Content Hub as the Headless CMS. I focused on creating an application architecture that can be integrated with Sitecore Content Hub only. A Headless CMS like Content Hub is like any other service in Composable DXP as opposed to traditional CMS. An application built on a traditional CMS has the CMS in the core and other composable services are added around it. There is no separation of the web application from the CMS in traditional CMS. Such is not the case for an application built with Headless CMS. We have a choice to select what CMS we want to use. Therefore the architecture of the application can be built with CMS decoupled from the application. This will give us the flexibility to use any Headless CMS with minimum change in the application. In this blog, I will discuss how I changed the architecture of my application for the previous posts to adapt a decoupled architecture. I used Sitecore Content Hub and ContentFul as Headless CMS. We will establish the fact that with this architecture we can switch between Headless CMS with very little change in the application.

Final Deployment Architecture

Below is the diagram that depicts the final state of our web application deployment architecture. Our application has the ability to switch between Headless CMS. A quick code change and deployment will switch the CMS.

Application Architecture

I built the architecture from the Frontend. If we build the architecture from the backend, i.e. a Headless CMS, it will be an application for that CMS. When we approach the architecture from the Frontend, we know what we need. We need all the React Components and we need data (props) for filling up these components with information. The data will be provided by the Headless CMS APIs. But, for building the schemas for the data, we don’t need to use a CMS immediately. We can build the schema and create fake APIs using something like json-server. I created a JSON file with data I needed and used json-server as if I am calling CMS APIs. This allowed me to build the full Frontend without worrying about any CMS. This way I could focus on the architecture.

To build an architecture that is decoupled from Headless CMS, I needed to use the Inversion of Control (IoC) design principle. There are many Dependency Injection (DI) Framework out there to implement IoC. One of the popular ones is TSyringe, a lightweight DI Framework for Typescript/Javascript. When it comes to using Design Pattern it is easier to work with a Typescript because it is a typed language. I converted my earlier Javascript based Nextjs application to Typescript. Next, I created an interface called IApiHelper for the methods I needed to create props for my React components. My component services used the CMS specific implementation of this interface to get data for the props. The DI container is used to inject the desired API helper to the service class to get the data from json-server or Headless CMS. The below diagram shows the architecture.

I have shared the code in Github.I have three implementations of IApiHelper. For Content Hub, I created ContentHubApiHelper, for ContentFul, I have created ContentFulApiHelper and for Json-server, I have created JasonServerApiHelper. To use a CMS, I need to import the Api Helper implementation of that CMS in GetStaticPropHelper.ts as shown below in the highlighted code.

import "reflect-metadata";
import HomeProps from "../models/HomeProps";
import BlogListProps from "../models/BlogListPorps";
import BlogProps from "../models/BlogProps";
import PageComponentService from "../services/PageComponentService";
import PageLayoutService from "../services/PageLayoutService";
import { container } from "tsyringe";
import { GetStaticPropsContext } from "next";
import { ParsedUrlQuery } from "querystring";
import AboutPorps from "../models/AboutProps";
import ApiHelper from "./ContentFulApiHelper";

container.register("IApiHelper", {
	useClass: ApiHelper,

Final Words

The purpose of this blog was to discuss how to build an architecture from the frontend so that we can decouple the web application from Headless CMS. I had to learn a whole new CMS called ContentFul which I enjoyed. ContentFul has fantastic documentation and tutorials. It is free for developers. I highly recommend you to explore ContentFul. I have deployed this web application in Vercel. This link https://photoblog-nextjs-ts.vercel.app/ will take you to the website.


Posted in Content Hub, ContentFul, jamstack, JavaScript, Next.js, Sitecore, Typescript | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Two ways to publish content on-demand from Sitecore Content Hub to a static website

In the last post, I discussed how I created a static website using Next.js and Sitecore Content Hub as a content repository. Web pages in the static website as it says are static. That means when some content changes in the content repository that will not be reflected on the website unless we deploy code. In the solution, I used Next.js Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) so that static pages will be revalidated after the assigned time and pages will be regenerated. For example, the below code shows that the Blog List page will be regenerated every hour.

  static async getStaticProps() {
      const client=await Helper.getContentHubClient();
      if(client) {
        const mainMenuItems = await Helper.getMainMenuItems(client);
        const footer = await Helper.getFooter(client);
        const intro = await Helper.getPageIntro(client, introName);
        const blogList =  await Helper.getBlogsFromCollection(client, contentCollection, route);
        return {
          props: {
            mainMenuItems: mainMenuItems,
            footer: footer,
            message: intro,
            blogList: blogList
          revalidate: 3600

The above approach is ok but it doesn’t give any control to content editor. Once the content editor change content, she has to wait until someone accesses the page to trigger the build. The approach I will discuss here will enable the content editor to publish as and when needed.

Publish content to static website using Sitecore Content Hub Action

Vercel lets us trigger a build using Deploy Hooks. Deploy Hooks is an API endpoint with unique id that is associated with the deployment configuration. When someone calls this API, Vercel will start the deployment for the associated configuration. In the build settings in Vercel you will find the Deploy Hooks in the Git section. Here you can add Deploy Hooks.

Deploy Hooks

We need to take this API endpoint and create an action of type API Call in Sitecore Content Hub. Below screenshot shows that action. There is only one purpose of this action. That is to call the Vercel Deploy Hook.

Content Hub Action

The usual way to call an Action in Content Hub is to use a Trigger. A Trigger is associated with some events in Content Hub. When such events happen Trigger calls the associated Action. Example of events are, add/modify/delete of an entity in Content Hub. Below is screenshot of such trigger.

Trigger Action

Although this approach works, there is a problem with this approach. The trigger runs every time content gets modified, and the action gets called. The action calls the Deploy Hook to run a build in Vercel. If the content editor changes a lot of content, this approach will deploy the site too many times. That’s not an efficient way to regenerate static pages. Ideally, I would like the content editor to push a button to call the action to publish the changed content when she is ready.

There is no straightforward way to call an Action manually in Sitecore Content Hub. Other than using Trigger, I can use Command API to call the External Action command like below but that will be calling from outside of Content Hub. I want to call the same API from Content Hub Admin site.

Request URL: https://my-ch-sandbox.stylelabs.io/api/commands/external.action/external.action
Request Method: POST

Request Body:
    "entity_id": XXXXX,
    "action_id": XXXXX,
    "properties": [],
    "relations": [],
    "action_execution_source": "ExternalAction",
    "extra_data": {
        "culture": "en-US"

There are two ways to call the external.action command from within Content Hub that I am aware of. I discussed both methods below.

External Page Component

External Page Component allows us to create a component using external JavaScript libraries. I have used jQuery to create a button on the Content Collection page. I have explained below how it works. Here is the button (External Page Component) on the Content Collection page.

External Page Component

To add an External Page Component on a page, you have to go to Manage -> Pages and select the page where you want to place the component. In my case, I opened the Content Collection page and added External Component on the right header column.

Add External Page Component

To configure the component I clicked on three dots (…) and selected Edit. Here in the Configuration section I entered the control name.

External Component Configuration

In the Template section I entered below HTML code to create the button UI. I used css classes available in Content Hub to create consistent UI. Notice that id of the button is ‘target’. This id is used in the jQuery code to call the action.

		class="btn btn-primary"
		title="Generate static pages"
		aria-label="Generate static pages"
		<i class="m-icon m-icon-lightning-bolt"></i>
		<span class="d-none d-sm-inline-block"
			>Generate static pages</span

In the Code section, I used below jQuery code to make ajax call to the action on button click event.

$( "#target" ).click(function() {
  var req = '{"entity_id":30487,"action_id":30872,"properties":[],"relations":[],"action_execution_source":"ExternalAction","extra_data":{"culture":"en-US"}}'
    url: `${options.api.commands.href}`.replace('{folder}', 'external.action').replace('{command}', 'external.action'),
    contentType: 'application/json',
     headers: {
        'x-auth-token' : '<my api key for auth>'
    type: 'post',
    data : req,
    success: function(data, status, jqXHR)
    error: function (jqXHR, status, error)

This accomplice the task. You may notice that I had to use an entity (entity_id) to make the API call because entity_id is a required parameter. My action though doesn’t need to be associated with an entity. This approach is good for any page but it is a little complex. Also, using External Page Component is a little risky because if Content Hub changes anything related to external libraries, templates, or in the API in the future, the component might break.

Custom External Action Entity Operation

The second approach to call the action manually doesn’t involve any coding. You can add External Action Entity Operation on any Detail Page. A Detail Page is always associated with an entity and the operation use that entity to call the action. If you follow the below animation, you will see how I added the External Action Operation on the Content Collection Details page.

Add External Action Entity Operation

This approach is simple. The only issue with this approach is that the Entity Operation button shows on all Content Collection Details pages. If we can live with that, this is the approach we should take.


In this article, I discussed how we could give control to content editors to publish content from Sitecore Content Hub to a static website. I have used Vercel for deploying and host my static site. The same approach works for other static site hosting services like Netlify, Surge, and others.


Posted in Content Hub, jamstack, Next.js, Sitecore | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How I solved the issues I encountered to build a static website using Next.js and Sitecore Content Hub

I built a static website using Next.js and Sitecore Content Hub. The architecture is simple. Sitecore Content Hub is used as a headless content and digital asset repository. I used Content Hub JavaScript Client SDK to access data from Content Hub. Next.js JavaScript framework is used to implement the website. I don’t want to talk about how I built the website. You can understand that if you look at the code which I shared in GitHub. What is more interesting to discuss is, what problems I faced and how I solved those problems.

The website is a simple blog website with multiple sections that you can visit using the main navigation or some internal links on the site. My objective was to build a website that is well structured and responsive. Here is the site in desktop and mobile view. If you want to visit the site click on this link. You may not see some images if they were not already cached in Vercel CDN and if my instance of Content Hub is not running. Images are hosted in Content Hub.

My Photo Blog

UI Markups

I started with designing the site using plain HTML and Sass. I am not much of a UI developer but these days I feel, I cannot completely stay away from understanding UI development if I want to architect web solutions. You can find the repository of the UI design markups in this GitHub repository My Photo Blog Markups. I made sure the design is responsive, followed best practices for Web Core Vitals, and followed best practices for accessibility. Two VS Code extensions that helped with UI markup creation that I highly recommend for anyone are, Live Sass Compiler and Live Server. I used ngrok to create a public URL to my localhost so that I can connect from my phone to test the markups.

Next.js App from UI Markups

The Next step was to convert these design markups to a Next.js application with hardcoded data. I separated code into different pages and components. For styling, I used module (component) level sass. Next.js has built-in support for Sass. You can find more information in Next.js documentation Built-in CSS Support. I shared this step of the application in GitHub repository https://github.com/himadric/photoblog-nextjs. This helped me understand how the Next.js application will work when I integrate with Sitecore Content Hub.

Next.js App integration with Sitecore Content Hub

Before I started working on converting my the Next.js application to access data from Sitecore Content Hub, I had to think about how I should organize content in Sitecore Content Hub. I had a good idea about how I want to approach it, but it was an iterative process. I separated contents into number content collections as shown in below screenshots. I had to create new content types and add additional properties in the built-in Blog type. The images are saved as Assets. I haven’t used blog images as attachments in the blog content to avoid drilling through relations to find images. I created public links of the images and saved the link in custom property.

Content Structure

Content Collections (click on the image to see larger view)

Contents in content collection

Content distribution

Issues I encountered

JavaScript Package Registration Issue

I used Content Hub JavaScript SDK to access data from Content Hub. Before I can install JavaScript SDK npm packages, I needed to add npm package feed https://slpartners.myget.org/F/m-public/npm/ in the npm package registry in my machine. After adding the package feed to the registry, I tried to install JavaScript SDK package @sitecore/sc-contenthub-webclient-sdk. I got the error that the package couldn’t be found.

The feed registration command

npm config set @sitecore:registry https://slpartners.myget.org/F/m-public/npm/

adds the feed URL in the global .npmrc file. When I looked at the content (you can use the command ‘npm config get’ or open the .npmrc from your users file folder in the text editor), I found the content looked like below

@sitecore:registry = “https://sitecore.myget.org/F/sc-npm-packages/npm/&#8221;
https://slpartners.myget.org/F/m-public/npm/ = “”

My global .npmrc already had a registry entry for Sitecore JSS. ‘npm config set’ doesn’t allow more than one value for the same registry key. There are two solutions to this.

1) Open the .npmrc file in a text editor (you can use the command ‘npm config edit’) and update the @sitecore registry with Content Hub JavaScript SDK feed.

2) Create a .npmrc file for the project and add the registry entry in that file.

The second solution is what I needed because it fixed the registry issue as well as I needed the .npmrc file to be part of the project for Vercel deployment to register the package feed.

Error: Cannot find module ‘form-data’ Issue

After installing the JavaScript SDK npm package, I wrote code to authenticate to Content Hub. When I tried to run the application I got the below compilation error.

error – ./node_modules/@sitecore/sc-contenthub-webclient-sdk/dist/clients/upload-client.js:17:0
Module not found: Can’t resolve ‘form-data’
Error: Cannot find module ‘form-data’

I resolved this issue by installing ‘form-data’ package using the below command.

npm install –save form-data

I posted the issue in Sitecore StackExchange

Module not found: Can’t resolve ‘fs’ Issue

Once I started refactoring code, Next.js thought refactored code that depends on packages that in turn dependent on ‘fs’ module will run in the browser. The code was written to run on the server side. I resolved this issue by adding below in the next.config.js.

webpack: (config, { isServer }) => {
  // Fixes npm packages that depend on `fs` module
  if (!isServer) {
      config.resolve.fallback.fs = false
  return config

Challenges building Header and Footer content from Content Hub

I built the Header and Footer of the website from contents in the Content Hub. To statically generate the Header and the Footer for every page, I had to get these contents from Content Hub using the getStaticProps method. My website’s Header and Footer are part of the Layout component which I added in the _app.js file because I didn’t want to wrap the code with the Layout component in every page. This works fine if I don’t need to load content in Header and Footer from an external source. For loading data from an external source, I have to use getStaticProps but this method is not allowed in _app.js. This is a known issue. If you want to learn more look at this discussion getStaticProps on _app.

I had two choices, 1) I can use getInitialProps in _app.js to get data from Content Hub, or 2) Use Layout component in every page and use getStaticProps to get the data from Content Hub. Option 1 although seems a good choice it is actually not because getInitialProps has been deprecated. I went for option 2. Although option 2 seems inefficient, it turned out to be not too bad after I refactored code to helper methods and implemented caching.

429 too many requests Issue

Sitecore Content Hub allows only 15 API calls per second unless the APIs are called from Portal with a web browser. You can find more about this in the Throttling section of Content Hub documentation. When I tried to create a production build, I started getting error 429. I had already implemented server side memory caching to reduce the number of API calls. To avoid the issue completely, I added a delay after every API call is made. This was a simple solution and it’s not a huge problem because this will only add additional time to the build. The build in the Vercel deployment took one and a half minutes.

Sitecore Content Hub Free Modeling License

I had to create some custom content types in Content Hub for Footer, Banner, other components. This works but since these types are created from M.Content, API response always returns all fields included in M.Content. I thought creating ‘Custom Entity Definition’ will be a more appropriate way to create these contents. But, creating ‘Custom Entity Definition’ requires the Free Modeling license. You can find more about Custom Entity Definition in Content Hub documentation.

Final Words

I liked the way this website implementation worked out. I think this architecture works well if the requirements for the website don’t need dynamic data access a lot. Even if contents change in the website frequently this architecture works because Next.js supports Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR). Here I have used Sitecore Content Hub as a Headless Content Repository. Content can be easily managed by business users in the Content Hub. But, Content Hub is not an Agile Content Management System like Sitecore XM or XP. In this architecture, a business user will not be able to create a brand new page. If the requirement is such that business users need the ability to create and modify pages, adding Sitecore XM/XP and using Sitecore JSS will be the desirable architecture. As far as DXP features as personalization and experimentation go, Composable DXP can be used. In the case of Sitecore, it can be achieved by integrating with Boxever.


Posted in Content Hub, JavaScript, Next.js, Sitecore | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Exploration of Four51 OrderCloud, its architecture, and Headstart setup

This is an exciting time to be in Software Development. Things that we had been hearing about, Micro Service Based Architecture, Cloud Native Application, API First Headless Architecture are finally shaping up nicely. Sitecore’s recent acquisition of cloud first commerce platform Four51 and Customer Data Platform (CDP) Boxever confirms that the trend is going to be integrating with specialty platforms than one company is building everything. Sitecore’s core platform is a Content Management System that enables us to create content and deliver content to the target audience. But, just delivering content without intelligence is not good enough. That’s why Sitecore has become a Digital Experience Platform. With the acquisition of Four51 and Boxever, Sitecore is bringing full Digital Experience to online Online Commerce. In this article, I will discuss the Four51 OrderCloud platform and show you how to set up the OrderCloud Headstart application, which is an application like Sitecore’s Habitat Demo. Let’s dive in.

tl;dr: If you are interested in only Headstart Setup go to the Setting Up Headstart section.


OrderCloud is an API First Headless truly Cloud Native B2B eCommerce Platform designed by Four51. OrderCloud architecture is MACH (Microservices, API-First, Cloud & Headless) certified. The MACH certification tells a lot about a platform. A Commerce platform that follows MACH architecture is modular and truly open for integration to other systems via Microservices and APIs. A typical MACH certified Commerce platform architecture looks like below and this looks very close to what we envision the OrderCloud architecture will be when it will be fully integrated with Sitecore.

Source: machalliance.org

Functional Architecture

Speaking about architecture, let’s talk about the Functional Architecture of OrderCloud. It will help us to understand as a product, what OrderCloud offers and what kind of B2B Commerce solutions we can create from it. In the core of OrderCloud following are the important entities that exist.

Seller: Seller is the orchestrator of the business. Seller defines how the business will be done. If Seller is a Manufacturer they might be selling products only to Buyers, but if Seller is a Distributor, in addition to selling products to Buyer, they might be connecting the Suppliers with the Buyers. Seller users are the admin users with highest privilege to OrderCloud APIs.

Buyer: A Buyer is a Customer or an organization with an account with the Seller so that they can purchase products. A buyer has one or more users. A user authenticates to the Storefront and orders products for the buyer. Buyer users can be put into groups for managing access levels and personalizing the buying experience.

Supplier: A Supplier is an organization in OrderCloud that fulfills orders placed by buyers of their products. Supplier is an optional construct in OrderCloud. A seller can be the only supplier in the system. Supplier users have restricted access to the Seller admin site where they can manage their products, orders, supplier information, and users. The Supplier can assign different roles to their users. Some can be responsible for managing products, some can be responsible for managing orders, etc.

User: User is someone who authenticates to the Storefront (Buyer User) or Seller Admin Site (Seller User) to use the site. Users can be assigned to User Groups for managing their access to the system as well as provide a personalizing shopping experience to buyers.

User Group: User Groups are roles when it comes to the administration of the application, but it also contains information that leads to personalized shopping from the buyers perspective. For example, information like Catalogs, Locations are assigned to User Groups. This drives the configuration of customer specific products in specific buyer locations. Roles in User Groups determine what users belong to a User Group can manage as far as administering the application goes. For example, if a Buyer User Group has AddressAdmin Role, a user in that group can add/modify/delete buyer addresses.

Address: A buyer or a supplier can have multiple addresses. From the buyer’s perspective, the address is where to order items will be shipped. Orders in OrderCloud can be shipped to multiple places because addresses can be attached at the line level. From the supplier’s perspective addresses are locations and these can be the addresses of warehouses. Seller’s addresses are locations for the sellers. When a seller is a sole supplier, these addresses can be warehouse addresses for fulfillment.

Catalog: Catalog defines a set of products. It drives what products a buyer can or cannot see in the storefront. A product can be assigned to more than one catalog. Products are organized in different categories. A Product in a Seller organization can be added by the seller or supplier selling the product. Although Suppliers can add products to the system, they cannot assign products to catalogs or organize them in categories, only sellers can do that.

Order: Order in OrderCloud represents the cart as well as the order submitted to the system. An order goes through a different state. If the status is ‘Unsubmitted’, it is a cart. If the status is ‘Open’ it is submitted to the system as an order. An order has directions in OrderCloud. An order from the buyer’s perspective is an outgoing order, but from the seller or supplier perspective, it is an incoming order. The supplier doesn’t see the order until the order is submitted, but the seller can see the order (cart) as an incoming order before submission. After submission of the order from the seller’s perspective, the order is both incoming (from buyer) and outgoing (to the supplier). The same order from the supplier perspective is an incoming order. This concept applies when accessing orders from the system using OrderCloud API. You need to use proper direction based on the API credential. If you are using the buyer’s credentials, you have to use ‘outgoing’ as the direction, but you are using the supplier’s credentials, you need to use the ‘incoming’ direction. The below image on the OrderCloud website describes this relationship.

Order Directions, Source: OrderClould.io

I haven’t seen any mention of invoices in OrderCloud. In many eCommerce platforms orders represent invoices after the order is completely fulfilled. Some eCommerce platform invoices are maintained separately. Invoices enable the buyer to make the payments after the invoices are generated by the seller. Often eCommerce platform integrates with third party invoice payment system like BillTrust which makes it easy for the buyer to manage their invoices of different purchases in one place.

Storefront: A seller may host more than one eCommerce website to sell products. A very common scenario for this is separate retail (B2C) website from B2B website. Some sellers choose to separate B2C sites from B2B sites because buyers’ experience in B2C sites is quite different than B2B sites. This is not the only reason to host more than one website. Seller may in the business of more than one brand and that may require a separate website too. Storefront in OrderCloud represents a website. You can have one organization in OrderCloud with multiple storefronts. Each storefront can have multiple suppliers and buyers associated with it.

In addition to the above entities, there are usual eCommerce entities that exist in the system, like, Promotion, Price, Shipping, etc. which drive eCommerce functions, but the above entities provide functional structure in OrderCloud. You can use the above described constructs to define a business. There are different business models described using the above constructs in the Commerce Strategy section in the OrderCloud document.

In the below diagram I tried to capture the high level functional architecture of OrderCloud. I may not be 100% correct about the Storefront part because there is not much documentation about Storefront in OrderCloud, but it is reasonable to think that Storefront will be related to Catalogs as Buyers are.

OrderCloud High Level Functional Architecture

Technical Architecture

OrderCloud is Cloud Native API first Headless eCommerce Platform which is constructed based on Micro Service based architecture. Below I described different parts of OrderCloud Platform Architecture.

OrderCloud Portal: OrderCloud Portal is where you will define your Seller Organization. Once you Sign Up and define your Seller Organization, that becomes your eCommerce System which you will be used for providing service to your buyers and optionally to your suppliers. All will be done using Restful APIs. OrderCloud Portal provides a nice API Console that you can use to query your eCommerce data as well as modify them if needed. The user has to authenticate to use APIs. OrderCloud uses OpenId Connect and OAuth2 for securing APIs. Every client who connects to OrderCloud for access to API has to have a ClientId and Client Secret. Below is a screenshot of the API Console.

OrderCloud API Console

Middleware: In OrderCloud Architecture, middleware is where integration to third services and cloud services happens. For example, if you want to integrate OrderCloud with an ERP, you will be implementing that in the Middleware. Also, if you want to integrate Cloud Services like, App Configuration, Blob Storage, etc., you will be implementing that here. Middleware can also be used to integrate with OrderCloud Webhooks via API endpoints in the Middleware. All services in the Middleware should be exposed by APIs in a headless manner. OrderCloud has provided a starter middleware project Catalyst in github.

Buyer UI: Buyer UI is eCommerce Storefronts that end users use to browse and purchase products. A Storefront functionalities are implemented by integrating with Middleware and OrderCloud APIs. Since OrderCloud is Headless, Buyer UI can be implemented in any language and platform, either client-side or server-side technology. OrderCloud has provided both .Net SDK and Javascript SDK for this purpose.

Seller / Supplier Admin: Seller / Supplier Admin is the Admin Portal to manage the eCommerce backend. Seller Admin Portal provides restricted access to Supplier users so that they can manage products they are selling, manage orders placed to them, warehouse inventory, and manage their users. Whereas Seller Admin users have full access so that they can define and manage the business. Seller Admin connects to the eCommerce backend via OrderCloud APIs. It can have its middleware if it requires to connect to any system other than OrderCloud. For example, the Seller may want to manage the payment from Seller Admin. In that case, Seller Admin has to be integrated with the payment system and that will require a middleware to be created. Unlike, Buyer UI, I imagine Seller Admin functionalities will not change from client to client. Also, Seller Admin bit more tightly coupled with OrderCloud architecture. For this reason, providing a fully functional but extensible Seller Admin by Sitecore will make sense. This will reduce the implementation cost as well as enable partners to extend the Seller Admin.

Webhook: Webhook is the way OrderCloud let the integrated system know that some event occurred in OrderCloud. For example, if you want to send an email notification when order status changes, you can create a Webhook in OrderCloud’s order API and that will call your send order status API associated with the Webhook. There are Pre-hook and Post-hook. Sending email when order status change is a Post-hook because webhook gets called after order status changes. You can add Webhook configuration like type of Webhook, Payload URL, OrderCloud API endpoints and API method, etc. in OrderCloud API Console. Typically you will host Payload API in the Middleware. This document describes how to create a Webhook in the OrderCloud Platform.

Below is the High Level Architecture of the Headstart Application. It is important to note that Headstart is a sample application. In actual implementation, architecture may change quite a bit.

High Level Architecture of Headstart

Extending OrderCloud

Whatever eCommerce platform you choose to implement eCommerce site for your client, there will be always requirements that will require you to customize the platform. OrderCloud platform architecture supports the Open-Closed Design Principle. It means, the platform is open for extension but closed for modification. You will not be able to modify the core platform and that makes the platform easier to upgrade. Since it is open for extension, you can easily add custom features on the top of the core platform.

There are generally three ways to extend the OrderCloud platform.

  • For outside integration, Middleware Services should be used.
  • For injecting your operational code into OrderCloud operation you should use Webhook. You can implement your Webhook APIs in the Middleware or a separate service. We discussed Middleware and Webhook in the previous section.
  • If you want to extend the OrderCloud schema to store additional data, you need to use Extended Property (XP). OrderCloud stores XP as JSON and you can have an elaborately constructed JSON. There are two things to remember, 1) the entire XP object cannot be more than 8000 bytes, and 2) XP should be consistent within an object (if you create XP for Order, the structure of that XP should be always same). Data included in XP can be searched, filtered, and sorted. Typically, XP should be used when a small amount of additional data needs to be added. If the need is to add a new object in the implementation, Middleware is the way to go. This article has nicely described how XP works in OrderCloud.

Setting up Headstart

You will find Headstart in Github. The ReadMe instruction is quite good, but I did face some issues. Watch the below video to see how I set up Headstart in my local machine and then used Azure DevOps to deploy applications. To set up Headstart you need an Azure account. You can create a free Azure account here. The issues and the solutions for them are described after this video.

Setup Issues

Registering with Third Party Services: My goal was not to set up Headstart and making it fully functional. For this reason, I haven’t configured all third party services. This caused some issues, especially with Avalara. It can take a long time to configure Avalara to return proper tax. So, I faked the Avalara calls in the Middleware. I Changed the code in AvalaraCommand class. To see the difference visit my Forked repository in Github. I configured SmartyStreet, which is required for address validation and easy to configure. I also configured Sendgrid for sending emails using the provided templates in the Headstart solution.

Seller UI Build Issue: I had a problem with building Seller App. The issue was finding Python version 2 in my machine. I resolved that by installing Windows Build Tools in my machine using npm (npm install –global windows-build-tools). Before installing, I removed node modules from Seller App.

Issue with OrderCloud CMS API: After building Seller App, I was getting 400 Bad Request error from ordercloud-cms-test.azurewebsites.net. This issue has been fixed in the Headstart repository. I resolved it by merging the original repository to my forked repository. This Stackoverflow thread helped me to understand, How to Sync a Forked Repository in Github.

Azure DevOps Deployment Issue: The ReadMe in Headstart repository has not fully explained how Azure DevOps Deployment works. I resolved below issues.

  • The azure-pipelines.yml was not generating a zipped artifact for the Middleware project. In the Middleware publish task, I had to change zipAfterPublish: true.
  • For Build Once, Deploy Many, you need to add “node inject-css defaultbuyer-test && node inject-appconfig defaultbuyer-test” in the Buyer release pipeline and “node inject-appconfig defaultadmin-test” in the Seller release pipeline. For this, you need to add ‘bash’ task in your release pipelines for Buyer and Seller. I showed this in the video.
  • The idea of Build Once, Deploy Many applies when you have multiple environments to deploy your application. This requires you to create Slots in Azure App Service and configure the release pipelines against those Slots. Each Slot in an App Service is used for an environment. I created Test Slots for Middleware, Buyer, and Seller App and deployed code there. If I need to deploy code to UAT, I have to create Slots for that each in App Services and create a release pipeline to deploy code in UAT Slots.


I enjoyed setting up Headstart. It helped me understand OrderCloud architecture. I like that OrderCloud is a highly extensible, Cloud Native platform with Micro Service based architecture and it does not limit me to any particular technology for using the platform. I hope my exploration of the platform and this article helps others to onboard to the OrderCloud platform quickly.


I would like to thank my colleague Daniel Govier for helping me with the Azure DevOps configuration. Without his help, it wouldn’t be possible for me to configure Azure DevOps deployment.

I would also like to thank Crhistian Ramirez for patiently answering all my questions in OrderCloud Community Slack.


Posted in Commercce, OrderCloud | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Address and Email domain validation in Sitecore

This is going to be a quick blog article. Only reason to write this blog is to share some code we developed for address and email domain name validation using the address recommendation service Loqate . For many of Nish Tech’s clients (specially eCommerce implementation), we have implemented address and email validation to reduce number of mistakes in account creation. We thought this can be helpful for others in the Sitecore community if they are looking for similar solution. Thanks to my colleague Santhosh twitter: @Santhosh4184. He worked on most of the coding.

I have shared only the Feature projects that contain the code for address and email validation in this Github Repo. You still need to add the project in your Helix based Sitecore Solution to make it work. We developed this using SXA but, same concept can be used for Sitecore Forms.

Here is an animation that shows how the module work.

Address and Email validation form

The way address validation through Loqate service works is, you have to create an account in Loqate and set up your account for the solution. After this, you will be provided an API Key and base Javascript code that you will need to add in your pages. For code example, look at ValidateAddress.cshtml and ValidateEmail.cshtml.

We hope this helps.


– Code in Github: https://github.com/himadric/AddressValidation
– Loqate: https://www.loqate.com/
– Follow Santhosh: https://twitter.com/Santhosh4184

Posted in Sitecore | Tagged , , | Leave a comment